Modern Physics offers a coherent if not unified description of
nature from the sub-atomic length scales of 10
m to
astronomical length scales of
m. Obviously it was not always so. Through the middle ages natural philosophers had
a disjoint perception of the Universe. Specifically there was
little connection between the description of physical phenomena
on earth and the description of the motion and properties of
the ``heavenly bodies'' such as our sun, the planets and stars.
This lack of a coherent understanding of our Universe is
perhaps best exemplified by the belief which persisted
until the middle ages that earth is the center
of the Universe. Aristotle reached this conclusion in (350BC)
based on the absence of visible parallactic shift of distant
stars. Claudius Ptolemy 140AD cemented this view by developing an
elaborate phenomenological description of the motion of the planets
in circular orbits about points close to the center of the earth each
with their specific epicycles. Up until the fifteenth century this world-view persisted. But to keep
up with more accurate observations eventually the description
became extremely complicated involving more and more epicycles
and without a hope of understanding where all this came from on a
more fundamental level.
Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543) proposed that the earth orbits around the sun along with the other planets and was able to understand some of the stranger aspects of the planet motion across the night sky. This view was violently opposed by catholics and protestants alike and though Copernicus died a natural death followers of his were actually burned on the fire as heretics.
Tycho Brahe (1546-1601) put the ideas to experimental scrutiny by far improving the available data on planetary motion through measurements taken with the naked eye from an observatory on a small island. Brahe managed to place the other planets in their right sequence from the sun but he could not convince himself that the earth moved. It was his assistant Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) who determined to find some systematics poured over the treasure trove of data for 20 years and finally derived his three laws of planetary motion :
Isaac Newton (1642-1727) at age 24 provided an explanation for
Kepler's laws and thereby tied together astronomical and terrestrial
physics. He recognized that there was no apparent weakening of the
gravitational pull of the earth on a body as you move that body from
sea level to the highest tower or mountain and so said why should
this force not also be responsible for forcing the moon to orbit the
earth? To explained Kepler's three laws based on his own three
laws of motion and the additional
assumption that a central
force acts
between all massive bodies:
![]()
where r is the distance between the bodies with mass
and
. We now see how Kepler's laws drop out from Newton's
simple Universal frame-work.